Even with extensive research, abundant statistical analyses, and continuous tracking of employment statistics, pinpointing the exact number of mine vehicle accidents occurring worldwide annually remains challenging. Additionally, determining the precise count of individuals who get hurt or lose their lives due to these incidents is equally complex.
In Australia, at least, the statistics are thoroughly gathered and broadly disseminated. Unfortunately, fatalities related to mining activities nearly doubled in 2024 to 11, compared to just six the prior year, as reported by SafeWork Australia, an Australian statutory body set up in 2009. Among these cases, at minimum three were associated with vehicle incidents.
Frequently, the extensive number of factors—ranging from local topography to regional weather patterns, the development stage of a site to the technology employed, and even the specific minerals and rare earth elements being mined—make operating a mine an extremely challenging endeavor.
Include the potential variation of these factors from one hour to another and from one shift to the next, and ensuring worker safety becomes a distinctive challenge for every mine.
Collision Avoidance: Risks and Countermeasures
One of the hurdles in preventing accidents include restricted sightlines, subpar communication, and insufficient employee training and expertise. According to Mitch Tanzer, who holds the position of global commercial director at Wabtec Digital Mine—a provider of collision avoidance solutions—additional complexities arise from fluctuating roadway situations, inconsistent vehicular velocities, and the existence of individuals walking around.
Nevertheless, better mining facility infrastructure, including advancements in lighting and traffic control systems, along with upgraded training programs and stringent safety protocols, provide solid initial steps. However, technology has also emerged as an essential factor—and will probably grow even more critical going forward.
Australia’s mines house approximately 5,994 trucks, 1,956 bulldozers, 1,064 excavators, 868 motor graders, 747 wheel loaders, and 47 electric rope shovels; together making up about 7% of the world’s total fleet, as reported by Massima. as MINE reported last September .
At this point, sensors have become standard, along with radar technology and proximity alert systems. Additionally, there’s an increasing tendency aimed at reducing the likelihood of fatal accidents or severe harm even more—the implementation of remote control and self-driving vehicles.
Although these developments have greatly enhanced safety, they continue to pose challenges, notes Liam Manning, the chief commercial officer at SAPHI Engineering. "In the past 5 to 15 years, we've witnessed considerable progress in collision prevention," he states.
He explains that traditional systems depended on pre-established detection criteria—whether through tags, GPS, LiDAR [light detection and ranging], or similar technologies—to provide proximity warnings according to set guidelines.
He points out that these systems operate within predefined limits and rely on responsive notifications. Solutions based on telematics track the positions and velocities of vehicles, whereas intelligent labels along with Light Detection and Ranging technology identify closeness to surrounding items. Nevertheless, he notes that even though such approaches work well, they cannot understand intricate settings or adjust to emerging threats without considerable human recalibration.
"For instance, a traditional system could set off an alarm every time a car came within a predetermined range of another object, irrespective of whether it posed a real threat or was merely part of normal operations like vehicles traveling inside specified areas," he explains.
Apart from potentially inaccurate reports, the greater risk is that they might cause "alert fatigue," as Manning puts it, which can make employees disregard or even turn off these systems. On the brighter side, these technologies are continuously advancing and getting better over time.
Artificial Intelligence: reshaping the future of crash prevention
According to Manning, however, a significant transformation looms ahead as AI is essentially reshaping safety and operational monitoring, bringing unprecedented levels of adaptability and intelligence into these processes.
He explains that instead of relying solely on proximity detection systems, integrating AI-powered imaging technology with current proximity sensors provides an enhanced degree of adaptability.
Manning argues that the advanced imaging and real-time data processing go further than traditional systems, offering operators an "restricted and frequently inflexible" perspective of potential dangers. In combination, these technologies represent a significant shift, "reshaping possibilities," with a degree of adaptability and smart functionality that was once unreachable.
Rather than merely identifying objects, AI-driven imaging systems examine the context to differentiate between actual risks and routine site operations," he explains further. "AI additionally enables immediate decision-making.
Tanzer states, "The application of AI in mining activities enhances the capability to identify intricate relationships within the ever-changing setting of a mine." These advancements also extend beyond this, as these systems adapt and refine themselves over time, thereby boosting precision and cutting down on incorrect alerts.
These tools can be utilized across various applications such as collision detection, vehicle safety monitoring, and enhancing production efficiency—all without requiring additional hardware or infrastructure. Tanzer further explains that with each piece of data gathered via AI, the algorithms grow increasingly advanced.
Manning thinks that moving from reactive detection to proactive intelligence will enhance both security and efficiency through comprehensive management of collision prevention, driver surveillance, and operational supervision within one integrated and flexible system.
"This indicates that mining companies have the ability to install equipment once and adapt it gradually, instead of having to swap out hardware when their requirements shift," he explains.
Combined, this would integrate collision avoidance into a broader network of smart, interconnected solutions. This perspective is shared by Tanzer, who expresses enthusiasm about how these systems can enhance fleet management and efficiency, forecast maintenance needs, and refine procedures and workflows.
The dangers of fatigue
The growing complexity provides an abundance of analytic information to leverage, ranging from offering context for risk identification to mitigating alert fatigue, enabling prompt on-site reactions, detecting patterns indicative of possible threats, and producing detailed safety and efficiency reports, as stated by Manning.
Speaking of worker fatigue It is widely acknowledged as a risk factor. According to Tanzer, this is another domain where AI-driven collision avoidance systems can provide advantages.
He states that mining corporations have excelled with 'lifestyle schedules.' However, they must also integrate technology. By tracking tiredness, they can guarantee workers perform optimally, thereby enhancing the mine’s total efficiency.
"As AI-powered models advance, mining firms have the opportunity to shift away from purely reactive safety protocols and begin leveraging real-time, context-aware decision-making to avoid accidents, enhance operational efficiency, and boost regulatory adherence — all through one unified system," Manning notes.
The significance of instruction and oversight
Nevertheless, these advancements might be crucial; however, they also bring about fresh risks and uncertainties, cautions Manning. According to him, such systems necessitate ongoing training, verification, and supervision by specialists to maintain precision. "This bears repeating: many claims surrounding these technologies are more hype than substance," he states, encouraging prospective buyers to witness the systems functioning within their specific setting prior to committing.
As Tanzer puts it, "While the mining sector excels at executing tech-driven initiatives, partnering with technology specialists is crucial for the success of not only the entire project but also the AI systems involved."
He emphasizes that the installation process should adhere to a systematic method encompassing comprehensive scoping activities, active stakeholder involvement, effective change management, along with training programs tailored for both operators and maintenance teams. He underscores that all these elements are essential components for achieving success.
Other worries involve regulations and standards — which Manning thinks are failing to keep up with advancements in technology in this area — possibly getting more stringent, perhaps even requiring real-time AI-driven collision detection and fatigue tracking.
He emphasizes that companies making investments must remain proactive about anticipating changes in regulations to maintain compliance, all while keeping their operational agility.
The costs associated with these technologies—especially as they extend beyond vehicle-to-vehicle surveillance—might rise, possibly turning into an insurmountable barrier. Additionally, the growing trend towards automating mines could result in a change in how AI is utilized. "Is AI safety going to remain essential in this form, or will it develop into a more comprehensive AI-driven site management system?" Manning ponders.
Then there is the ever-present cybersecurity risk He has strong feelings about this topic. "We encourage every mining company to confirm that their AI providers are based locally, provide complete clarity regarding system integrations and data movement, and can show proof of success with other significant mining companies," he states.
Awaiting the AI transformation
In light of this, the prospects for AI-based collision avoidance look promising, as the technology has moved beyond the initial adoption stage and is now neither unproven nor experimental.
"AI will transform mining safety, but precisely what that entails is evolving," Manning states.
Currently, he suggests that mining businesses ought to initiate conversations about extensive incorporation, clear regulations, and practical dependability to gauge how swiftly and efficiently this can turn into typical procedure for them.
The experiences from initial implementations have honed the technology, minimized hazards, and demonstrated its efficacy," he goes on. "This does not mean everything is rosy; there are still dangers and uncharted territories to investigate, yet considerable advancements have been achieved.
"Could AI improve mining's collision avoidance technology?" was initially developed and shared by Mining Technology , a Massimaowned brand.
This website includes information added in good faith for broad informational use. However, it isn’t meant to serve as advice you can depend upon. We make neither representations nor warranties—whether expressed or implied—about its precision or thoroughness. Before acting based on the material found here, seek specialized or professional counsel.